How Expectation Shapes What We Taste

A blind taste test by researchers at the University of Copenhagen shows that Danes prefer the taste of conventional, organically-farmed smoked salmon to wild salmon. However, the picture is turned upside down the moment we discover where a fish comes from.

A large number of packets of sliced ​​and vacuum-sealed smoked salmon hit Danish shopping carts every year. The vast majority of this smoked salmon comes from Norwegian aquaculture farms. However, in recent times, conventionally farmed Norwegian salmon have gained a questionable reputation and notoriety for containing chemical and pharmaceutical residues, as well as contaminating the marine environment and spreading disease to wild populations. However, according to the Danish Food and Veterinary Administration, salmon on the Danish market do not have a problem with unwanted chemicals, and it is very rare for authorities to find pharmaceutical residues.

But it seems that our knowledge about production conditions plays an important role in how we perceive taste. A study by researchers at the University of Copenhagen emphasizes the point.

In the study, 92 Danes were asked to test samples of conventional, organic and wild smoked salmon. The first round was a blind test in which the test subjects were not informed about the type of salmon they were testing. In the second round, the subjects were informed. After each round, the test subjects rated their liking for the samples.

3 types of smoked salmon

Conventional farmed salmon: Most conventional aquaculture is carried out on farms where the fish live in pens with nets. There is an environmental impact in terms of the discharge of chemical and pharmaceutical residues, just as farmed salmon can, in very rare cases, contain residues of drugs used to combat salmon lice.

Organically Farmed Salmon – Fish live in pens with nets, but with more space. The use of drugs is minimal and genetically modified feed is not used.

Wild Salmon – Many Atlantic salmon stocks are overfished or fully exploited, while several North Pacific stocks are robust. Wild salmon has a higher content of environmental poisons than farmed salmon (although not to an alarming level). On the other hand, wild salmon generally has a higher content of omega-3 fatty acids.

Expectations are conveyed to taste

In the blind test, conventional and organic salmon outperformed wild salmon, which scored significantly lower than either of the two culture products. Beyond that, conventional salmon tended to be more palatable than organic. However, once the test subjects were briefed on the production method, things quickly changed. Among reported respondents, conventional salmon ranked last, while wild salmon ranked second and organic salmon first.

“The test shows that people’s expectations of a product are based on the information they receive, and that this affects their overall taste experience. With smoked salmon, there seems to be a perception that wild salmon should taste better than salmon, which is conventionally However, blind testing revealed that people simply preferred the taste of farmed salmon, “says study first author and PhD fellow Mausam Budhathoki, who conducted the study in conjunction with his graduate thesis in the Department of Food Sciences.

According to the researchers, there are several possible explanations for people’s preference for farmed fish.

“One possibility is that people are more familiar with the taste and color of farmed salmon, as this is clearly the most widely available type of salmon on the market. Another reason may be that wild salmon has less flavor because it is leaner than farmed salmon, as was the case here, “suggests Mausam Budhathoki.

It’s not like shooting fish in a barrel

The study, which also included focus group interviews, reveals that Danes don’t know much about farm-raised salmon.

“It seems that many Danes are quite confused about the differences between various salmon products. This is for good reason, as the salmon production chain is long and relatively opaque. Many factors can influence perceptions about a product. Do you have any pharmaceutical residues? Does it come from an over-exploited population? Have you lived a natural life? And what exactly is fish welfare? Says Helene Christine Reinbach, lead author and associate professor in the Department of Fish Science. Food.

She continues: “In testing, wild salmon clearly score points with respect to provenance information. It provides positive associations about being more natural and consequently better in terms of animal health and welfare. The fact is, however. , that only farmed salmon is eligible for organic certification in Denmark, where there are strict sustainability, health and animal welfare requirements in production. On the other hand, most of the wild salmon populations in our part of the world are in poor condition and have higher toxin concentrations than farmed salmon. ”

Organic salmon wins, but we tend not to buy it

Despite their higher price, many organic foods have significantly increased their market shares in Denmark in recent years. However, sales of organic fish, including salmon, remain sluggish. As organic salmon scored highly in both rounds of the taste test, the researchers believe there is obvious potential for organic smoked salmon producers and other stakeholders.

“There is a clear opportunity for promotion, by equipping consumers with more information about the positive aspects that differentiate organic salmon from conventional and wild-caught salmon. For example, more information could be included on the packaging to help to guide consumers, regarding the sustainability and health benefits of organic smoked salmon. At the same time, the sector should work to increase the availability of organic options in local stores, as it may still be difficult to get it “, Helene Christine Reinbach concludes.

Reference
Budhathoki M, Zølner A, Nielsen T, Reinbach HC. The role of production method information in sensory perception of smoked salmon: a mixed methods study from Denmark. Foods they prefer. 2021; 94: 104325. doi: 10.1016 / j.foodqual.2021.104325

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: the material may have been edited for its length and content. For more information, contact the cited source.